I am writing this review after watching the last show of BvS
in my city. I saw this film almost a month after its release. And thus, before
having known y opinions about the film, most of you must have made the opinions
of your own.
Not
really getting into the story of the film I would skip to the part where I
share what I felt about it. -
I was
never too excited to watch this film after knowing that Zack Snyder is going to
don the hat of the director for this one. I liked 300, I am yet to see The
Watchman, but I did not like 'Man of Steel' one bit. Therefore, I didn't feel
that Snyder can do any justice to the characters of DC comics. But two things -
It was BATMAN and it had Ben Affleck.
The
Dark Knight series hangover still makes itself fresh every time we watch any
part of it. The Christopher Nolan's trilogy has taken the BATMAN character and
Batman psychology to the pinnacle both in terms of film-making and in terms of
significance. And if anyone had to take forward the Batman franchise, they
should have been either better than him or at least as good as him (Christopher
Nolan).
However, Snyder doesn't even reach up to 25% of what Nolan has done.
Keeping
Nolan away and considering this as the film that came to us - Batman vs
Superman : Dawn of Justice, is an action pack film. It starts very well with
Bruce Wayne and Gotham and the destruction impacts in the previous Man of
Steel. They have brought two worlds of Batman and Superman together in a very
convincing way. The background set up that is made on the basis of comics and
previous franchises of DC films makes you eager to know what lies ahead. Plus,
Ben Affleck is great as Bruce Wayne. You cannot wait more to see him in a Bat suit.
However,
maybe after shooting or perhaps writing that much of the script, Snyder's wife
cribbed to go on a vacation to India - Snyder had to listen and here he met all
the conventional Masala Bollywood film writers of Yash Raj, Rajshree and
Balaji. The film after that becomes too typical. The story is like just any
other superhero story. Two heroes fight against each other because of some
simple miscommunication. They become friends because of their MAA (mother). (At
a point I felt Snyder also met he writer of Mother India while doing planchet
or something, all of sudden the mother becomes too important in the story as
big as this for its biggest plot twist.) Then the human villain creates a
monster, who is shapeless and brainless and shouts loudly when he sees the
camera shooting him. And there is some symbolism of women empowerment because
they had the budget o cast Amy Adams and Gal Gadot. And some random clippings
of Flash and Aquaman because they have to make JUSTICE LEAGUE in 2018 or 2019.
The
story lacks depth, the characters lack significance. Half of the things happen
in dreams of Bruce Wayne.
Jeremy Ions as Alfred and Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor are impressive. Ben Affleck is good too.
Jeremy Ions as Alfred and Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor are impressive. Ben Affleck is good too.
And
about the overall impact of the film. It is too much in dark. Maybe they failed
to connect a few sockets while shooting and that's why a few bulbs didn't lit.
There was no visual clearance to anything. You had to take efforts to
understand the frame, to spot the characters and to understand their placement
in the field of vision. The moments captured and uncertain editing put you in
so much of confusion and lack of clarity in what they wanted to communicate
through the medium.
Maybe they knew the story lacked uniqueness and characters lacked significance and yet they had to show as if they are doing a great film of some kind and that's why they kept a few things so un-understandable that people would say that the film was different. They have not shown Bat suit properly. the Bat mobile is only seen in outline in spite of a huge car chase.
All this was present in Nolan's batman. His treatment was similar, he had major level of chaos in his films as well. But There was hell lot of clarity and every single frame meant something. It had substance.
Maybe they knew the story lacked uniqueness and characters lacked significance and yet they had to show as if they are doing a great film of some kind and that's why they kept a few things so un-understandable that people would say that the film was different. They have not shown Bat suit properly. the Bat mobile is only seen in outline in spite of a huge car chase.
All this was present in Nolan's batman. His treatment was similar, he had major level of chaos in his films as well. But There was hell lot of clarity and every single frame meant something. It had substance.
Maybe I am struggling to like the film. I have liked Ben
Affleck, but the film can never be called great as an individual film. It will
be liked only because it has Batman.
Verdict - 4/10.

"Maybe they failed to connect a few sockets while shooting the film and that's why a few bulbs didn't lit."- Shoneel Yallatikkar
ReplyDeleteI am going to remember this forever!
Your reviews have the ability to pull in or pull out the audience of the theatre. I don't regret my decision of not watching this film in the theatre, thanks to your review! ;)